Looking at some of the distant buildings in this scene, you'll note extra visible detail in the PC version. Also note the missing reflection of the sight on the player weapon on both console versions. Right out of the gate, the higher resolution capabilities of the PC version shine through. Provided you game from a decent viewing distance, the loss in clarity isn't a huge problem. While the image remains soft on both platforms, TAA manages to clean things up and eliminates the severe aliasing that was present in previous Battlefield games. It's been the same since Battlefield 4 launched on consoles but at this point, the situation has improved thanks to DICE's excellent temporal anti-aliasing.
BATTLEFIELD 1 PC 720P
If we look beyond performance, it's standard Frostbite fare on consoles - Xbox One operates at 720p while PS4 is at 900p. With this in mind, we're extremely interested to see if DICE can find a creative way to overcome these issues and deliver performance similar to Battlefront, which topped out its player count with 40 participants. These large dynamic maps are a huge drain on CPU resources and that's something neither console can spare. Neither BF4, nor the Visceral developed follow-up Battlefield: Hardline, managed to deliver a stable level of performance in the busiest game modes. Keeping this in mind, there's every reason to think that Battlefield 1 will reach its objective come release time, or at least hand in a much stronger showing.Īt the same time, this is the first full-on 64 player multiplayer console game DICE has developed since Battlefield 4. By the time it was released, the team had managed to reach a near perfect 60fps update. Last year's Star Wars Battlefront was shown off at E3 running on PlayStation 4 with an average frame-rate coming in around 45fps. There's no reason to feel disappointment just yet - the important thing to remember here is that DICE has a real history of releasing less than optimal alpha versions of its games while following up with remarkably polished final code. While the two are very similar in terms of performance, it's clear that Sony's platform is currently the one struggling the most with frame-rate - and of course, it's the PS4 that has the lower level of CPU performance. Moving across the battlefield with light combat is enough to incur dips into the 40s while the busier sections can drop into the 30s - especially on PlayStation 4. At this stage in development, neither console is able to maintain a stable level of performance in this mode. Conquest, on the other hand, is a very different story, calling to mind the performance challenges faced by the previous Battlefield titles: BF4 and Hardline.įocusing on large scale 64-player battles with lots of destruction, Conquest is the heart of Battlefield, and also the most demanding on hardware. Limited to just 24 players, we found that both consoles had little difficulty hitting and maintaining the target frame-rate. Domination focuses on a smaller, infantry based skirmishes. There are two modes in this alpha - conquest and domination - and each one offers a very different performance profile. The key discussion point surrounding this alpha is one of performance - Battlefield 1 targets 60 frames per second on both consoles just like the last three DICE titles, but in its current form, it's not quite there. We've spent time with the PC version already but, now that the console version is out in the wild, we've been able to put all three versions to the test. In typical DICE fashion, what we have here feels like a genuine alpha test as opposed to a marketing demo so of course, you can expect some rough edges. You can find it on Steam here.Announced just two months ago, Battlefield 1 is now available to select users in alpha form across all three major gaming platforms. I enjoyed the little I played Battlefield 1, too.
BATTLEFIELD 1 PC SERIES
I was a big player of the series from 1942 through to Battlefield 3, so a version that lets me remix elements - rules, units, items, maps - from those older games sounds like a great time to me. My interest in Battlefield has been reignited by the recent announcement of Battlefield 2042, and particularly its Portal mode. The Great War might have been unique, but Battlefield 1 isn’t.īrendy also had a wonderful time trying to find a nice cottage in the French countryside during the war. There’s grenade spam and sniper alleys and miraculous dive-bombing pilots who somehow manage to use the terrible flight controls. In his Battlefield 1 review, Brendy said that it was " safely good."Įven with the addition of Operations mode and the behemoths and the return to a more instinctively dramatic setting, it still feels like Battlefield. Battlefield 1 is EA Dice's confusingly-named World War 1-set shooter, and the predecessor to Battlefield V, obviously.